Can Anybody Find Me a Witch? 10/20/2002

First United Methodist Church, Birmingham, Michigan

Scripture: I Samuel: 28:3-19

Desperation makes people do funny things. Desperation makes some people sweat and swear. It makes other people shake and scream. In response to desperation, some people flee while other people fight. A few react by killing others. While others react by killing themselves. I have known desperate people to reach for things like a bottle, a capsule, or a body to hold in the night. Sometimes desperate people reach for God, albeit often as a last resort.

 

“Desperation” is a funny word. It sounds urgent….immediate….dramatic. It has a “right now” ring of intensity to it. But the root word of “desperation” is “despair.” Despair does not sound urgent at all. Despair sounds slow and quiet. People talk about “sinking into despair,” inviting us to picture them in slow-acting quicksand, being sucked below the surface of normality a couple of inches at a time.

 

As Exhibit A, I give you Saul, a suddenly desperate man, but one who has been despairing for a long time. When we meet up with him in this morning’s text, we find him riding the “down escalator” of life. He is on his way out….out of favor….out of power….out of options….and almost out of days. His star is burning out. David’s star is rising up. Several floors back, their escalators passed, with David’s ascending and Saul’s descending. History doesn’t record if either waved.

 

Why can’t people stay on top? Why is there always someone better, brighter, faster, fairer or younger in the wings? Put this on the list of perplexing questions you are planning to ponder when you retire. All we know is that Saul’s confidence is shot. But he’s far from the first one. It happens lots of times….to lots of people….in lots of places. Even in the suburbs. It is a myth that people who live in the suburbs “have it all together.” ‘Tis not necessarily so. Despair is no respecter of subdivisions. After all, Saul lived in a big house. Kings usually do.

 

But we need to back up a bit. A little stage setting would seem to be in order. After all, who is Saul and why should we care? Saul is the first great king of Israel. But since great kings, like a lot of other things, come in threes, we seldom hear Saul’s name mentioned by itself. He is always referred to as part of a trio (Saul, David and Solomon). Strangely enough, although page after page of the Old Testament is devoted to Saul, we don’t know many factual things about him. We do not know the length of Saul’s reign, the dates of Saul’s reign, or how old Saul was when he began to reign. An educated guess suggests that he reigned at least 20 years and died about 1000 B.C. His public life began with great promise. He possessed all of the physical and moral attributes of a king. We are told he had an imposingly-large physique (the more I read about Saul, the more I picture Kirk Gibson, albeit with a better beard). Saul had initiative. Saul had courage. Saul had charisma. But, best of all, Saul had “the spirit of the Lord mightily upon him.” (I Sam. 11:6)

 

Which was a good thing, considering the obstacles in Saul’s path. In terms of governance, there was no central monarchy prior to Saul. The Israelite confederacy was at a critically low ebb. Israel was ruled by a collection of regional judges, divided by tribal loyalties and awash in political jealousies. Picture county executives, if it helps you. But the weakness of Israel from within was small potatoes compared with Israel’s vulnerability to attack from without. That’s because Saul had to put up with the Philistines who opposed him, outnumbered him, and forced his minimal army to go into battle with unsharpened weapons. Which is a great story (I Sam. 13:19), but irrelevant to my purpose here.

 

Still, Saul prevailed, delivering Israel out of the hands of those who plundered her (I Sam. 14:47). But then Saul made his tragic mistake. And let me warn you, this will show you how unbelievably primitive this story really is. Following a victorious battle against the Amelekites, Saul failed to observe an ancient practice among the Hebrews known as the “Herem.” This practice required that every last vestige of a defeated enemy be destroyed on the spot. This was to be done as an act of devotion to God. Apparently, Saul went into battle against the people of Amelek. He was victorious. And he killed virtually all of the people. But Saul spared the life of the Amelekite king. He also spared the best of the sheep, goats and cattle. As his reward for being merciful to the enemy, he was deemed unfit to be king, and it was announced that God’s favoritism was being removed from Saul. Having disobeyed God’s command to slaughter everything in sight, God’s spirit would no longer “rest mightily upon him.” Instead, God’s spirit would come to rest upon the shoulders of another.

 

Who said so? Samuel said so. And who was Samuel? Well, it would appear that Samuel was a little bit of a lot of things. He was a busybody who also fancied himself as a king-maker. In terms of self-identification, he sometimes called himself a prophet, sometimes a priest, and still other times a seer. But he always seemed to know what God was thinking. What’s more, he was not terribly shy about telling people what God was thinking. The amazing thing was that people listened. And so when Samuel said that you were on God’s blacklist, the effect of his pronouncement was to make it so. Why? Because Samuel said it, that’s why. Which was the turning point for Saul. It was all downhill from there. To be sure, Saul continued on as king until his death. But from Samuel’s pronouncement forward, he was not only in the process of losing his kingdom, but he stood in the tragic awareness that he had already lost.

 

Enter David. Samuel privately found him, privately anointed him, and privately bestowed God’s blessing upon him. Then he publicly announced to anyone and everyone that the spirit of the Lord had departed from Saul and come to rest upon David. Worse yet, Samuel announced that the Lord had sent another spirit to Saul….an evil spirit….for the purpose of tormenting him. But the bitter irony was this. This man upon whom God’s spirit now rested….this David….this rising one…. this one waiting in the wings for Saul’s job….had a special gift that could soothe Saul’s troubled spirit. Which was why David was brought into the service of Saul, and why “Saul loved him greatly.” We read:

 

And whenever the evil spirit was upon Saul, David took the lyre and played it with his hands. Whereupon Saul was refreshed and the evil spirit fled him for awhile.

 

And from this point forward, the historian tells the story in ways that are meant to build David up while tearing Saul down. We are told that David is “ruddy,” “handsome,” and that he has “beautiful eyes.” The Hebrew will even allow for a translation that reads “bedroom eyes” (which will become important in a subsequent story). Furthermore, we read that David is “skilled at music….a genius at justice….prudent in speech….a man of good presence….and a man of valor in war.” Apparently, there is nothing David cannot do. Scarcely out of his teens, he confronts the giant known as Goliath of Gath. Many have suggested that Goliath was “too big to hit.” Instead, David looked at Goliath and said: “He’s too big to miss.” The most amazing thing is that there is reason to doubt that David killed Goliath at all. It is quite likely that the historian of this period took a few liberties, and that Goliath was most likely slain by Elhanan, son of Jereorejim, the Bethlehemite.

 

But David is victorious in enough other places so that women begin to sing and dance as they roam the streets, crying:

Saul has slain his thousands,

and David, his tens of thousands.

Ah, what a cruel blow, coming as it does from the songs of street women.

 

Saul’s torment deepens. Three times he makes an attempt on David’s life. Three times he fails. Saul’s daughter, Michal, becomes David’s wife. Saul’s son, Jonathan, becomes David’s best friend. All of which deepens the guilt Saul feels over his jealousy. But he can’t rid himself of it. So he drives David into exile. But even with David safely at a distance, there is no easing of Saul’s anguish.

 

Now, as we catch up with him this morning, everything is coming unraveled. Saul is tired. Samuel is dead. David is hiding. And, once more, the Philistines are back….in spades. When Saul sees the size of the Philistine camp, he becomes so frightened that his heart beats violently. He inquires of God. But there is no answer. God does not answer through a dream. And God does not answer through the rolling of the stones (something akin to the rolling of dice). So Saul says: “Get me a witch. We will have ourselves a little séance. We will awaken Samuel from the dead. He will tell us what God has in store.” To which one of his servants says: “That’s going to be a little hard to do, O King, since you kicked all of the witches and wizards out of the land.”  Leading Saul to scratch his chin and say: “I guess I did, didn’t I? But I don’t care. I need a witch. So find one.” Which is when someone says: “I think there is one in Endor.”

 

So Saul disguises himself and goes to Endor by night. Meeting the witch, he commands her: “Divine for me a ghost. Raise up the man I now name for you.” But this witch is no dumb cookie. She has fled to Endor because she values her scalp. What’s more, she recognizes Saul’s voice (from his many speeches on television, no doubt). So she says: “I know a trap when I see one.”

 

Saul responds by saying something that sounds like: “Shut up. Do what I tell you. This little matter will remain between the two of us. Do you think I want anybody to know what I am doing here? Divine for me the ghost I have named and nothing will happen to you.” So the witch of Endor goes into a trance and congers up an old man in a robe. Convinced that he is Samuel, Saul engages the ghost in conversation.

 

Samuel:  “What do you want?”

 

Saul:  “The Philistines are about to wage war against me. God has departed. He answers me no more. Please tell me the future.”

 

Samuel:  “You don’t want to know.”

 

Saul:  “Who will win tomorrow?”

 

Samuel:  “Don’t ask.”

 

Saul:  “What will happen to me?”

 

Samuel:  “By this time tomorrow, you shall be with me. Your sons shall be with me. And your army shall be delivered into the hands of the Philistines.”

 

So, on the eve of death, the one who is nearly dead turns to one who is already dead, only to receive a message about dying.

 

As stories go, it is as primitive as it is powerful. And, as stories go, it is not very kind to Saul. But neither is it very kind to God. Still, there are messages to be found. Let me briefly suggest two. The first is a message about avoidance….ours. The second is a message about abandonment…. God’s. First things first.

 

There is no avoiding the struggles of life. There is no immunity, even for kings. Neither are shortcuts offered to desperate men. “Send me a witch,” cries Saul. He might as well be saying: “Send me an answer to everything that vexes me.” Bringing commentary to bear upon this text, John Schroeder writes: “Isn’t it just like primitive religion to offer such devices?” But primitive religion is very much in vogue. Its modern-day counterparts are everywhere. We have mediums and astrologer. We also have newspapers where one can read one’s daily horoscope. We have no lack of simplifiers who provide short solutions to long problems, forgetting that there are many human problems which must simply be lived through. “Character,” says Howard Kohn, “is the sum total of everything we have struggled against.” Warming to his task, he adds: “How stupid of the church to advertise its central message as having to do with getting rid of our tensions and learning to relax. It is a small wonder that people come to regard churches as secondary bedrooms, where they can supplement on Sunday morning the sleep they didn’t quite get their fill of on Saturday night.”

 

The function of religion is not to secure for its people easier lives, but to build within its people stronger souls. And high on the list of hard things that cannot be avoided is the unknown character of the future. The golf pro tells me in soft, measured tones, to visualize a desirable result….visualize a sweet, slow backswing….visualize a smooth, steady follow-through…. visualize my Titleist 2 elevating quickly, soaring majestically, landing softly, and rolling to a stop six inches from the pin. My golf pro does it all for me and my ball. Except hit it. That’s not included in the fee I pay for my lesson. There are no shortcuts, even for those who can afford the price of a seer. Forget the witch. That’s my word on avoidance. Don’t.

 

And here’s my word on abandonment. God won’t. I told you that the story of Saul and the witch of Endor was a primitive one. I warned you that it would give you a primitive God….a God of fickle favoritism. Saul’s God is one who likes some people and sours on other people. Saul’s God withdraws from the people he sours on, conveniently arranging to be out to lunch when people on the blacklist call. But take heart. Israel lived to write the story of a better God. Word of that God is sprinkled all over the Old Testament. I give you one sample from the Psalmist…. Psalm 139 to be exact.

 

            O Lord, you have searched me and known me.

            You know when I sit down and when I rise up;

            you discern my thoughts from far away.

            You search out my path and my lying down,

            and are acquainted with all my ways.

            Even before a word is on my tongue,

            O Lord, you know it completely.

            You hem me in, behind and before,

            and lay your hand upon me.

            Such knowledge is too wonderful for me;

            it is so high that I cannot attain it.

 

            Where can I go from your spirit?

            Or where can I flee from your presence?

            If I ascend to heaven, you are there;

            if I make my bed in Sheol, you are there.

            If I take the wings of the morning

            and settle at the farthest limits of the sea,

            even there your hand shall lead me,

            and your right hand shall hold me fast.

            If I say, “Surely the darkness shall cover me,

            and the light around me become night,”

            even the darkness is not dark to you;

            the night is as bright as the day,

            for darkness is as light to you.

 

But let me tell you what I’ve learned about that language. I learned that the phrase “take the wings of the morning” is a euphemism for death. As is the phrase “to dwell in the outermost parts of the sea.” The psalmist is saying, even if I take the wings of the morning….even if I dwell in the outermost parts of the sea….meaning, even if I die….even if the lights go out in Georgia (or in my life)….even if my body is blown to pieces by the sniper and is scattered over the surface of a Ponderosa parking lot in northern Virginia….even there God’s hand shall meet me and God’s right hand shall hold me.

 

I just spent four days with 23 of my big-church pastor friends in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. These are 23 preachers who are good for me….good to me….heck, just plain good. But the bottom is falling out for one of them. He’s hanging on to the pastorate of the second largest Methodist church in Indiana by a thread. But the thread is in the process of snapping on him….or being cut for him. He’ll be history soon….done, soon….out, soon….thrown unceremoniously from the escalator, soon.

 

“How are you handling it?” I asked. To which came the answer: “There are a lot of mornings when, if I didn’t have my Psalms and my Zoloft, I don’t know if I would get out of bed.”

 

Well, as for Zoloft, I won’t knock what I haven’t tried. As for the Psalms, I will push what I have tried. But this much I know. Both beat the witch.

 

 

 

 

Note: The story from I Samuel 28 is customarily referenced under the heading “Saul and the Witch of Endor,” even though more modern translations substitute the word “medium” for the word “witch.” Witches were commonly held to have existed in the ancient Near East and were doubtless known to the Israelites. The Old Testament contains lists of such persons under various names (no longer precisely definable) but which certainly included witches. The longest such list is found in Deuteronomy 18:10-11 where involvement with such persons is strictly forbidden. The so-called Witch of Endor falls within this category, but is more properly referred to a necromancer or medium.

Print Friendly and PDF

Calling for a Little Backup 1/13/2002

William A. Ritter

First United Methodist Church, Birmingham, Michigan

Scripture: Genesis 3:17-35

Where to begin….this sermon….any sermon….a year’s worth of sermons? How about a love story? You can never go wrong with a love story. Besides, isn’t that how we ended the year just past….with a love story (albeit, of a different kind)? That one spoke in “baby talk” about God’s passionate devotion to his creation. This one speaks (in gritty adult conversation) about Jacob and Rachel’s passionate devotion to each other. Oh, it’s a good one. So good that somebody ought to film it. But who would play Rachel? Meg Ryan? Gwynneth Paltrow? Julia Roberts? Ponder that for a while. Drop me a note, mid-week, if it keeps you awake. Somebody in the church should think about it before the people in Hollywood think about it for us.

 

Actually, Rachel enters the story late. As does Jacob, by a few seconds. A few seconds, that is, behind his twin brother Esau, at whose heel the Bible says Jacob is grabbing when they come…. first one, then the other….from the womb. It is as if Jacob is saying, even prenatally: “Out of the way. Me first.” Which wasn’t how it turned out at birth. But which was very much how it turned out in life, given that Esau was never so quick again as the day he came into the world. In fact, Esau was slow. Of step. Worse yet, of wit. And hairy, too (or so the Bible says). For we are told that Esau was a hairy man while Jacob was a smooth man.

 

I don’t know much about that. What I do know is that Jacob soon surpassed his slightly-older brother….tricking him once….tricking him twice….even tricking their daddy with the connivance of their mommy (go to work on that one, all of you amateur Freudians)….to the point that by the time both boys were teenagers, Jacob owned the elevator while Esau got the shaft.

 

Which made Esau rip-roaring mad. And which made Jacob leave town (quickly), finally landing in the land of Aram (which, today, would put him squarely in the middle of Syria). Which was his mother’s brother’s land….meaning his uncle’s land….meaning his uncle Laban’s land. But before Jacob reaches town, he reaches the town’s well….the local “watering hole” as it were…. where, as sometimes happens at local Birmingham watering holes, he meets a woman. And he falls deeply (and immediately) in love. Within three verses of meeting sweet Rachel, we are told that he kisses her and breaks into tears. Jacob is the first person to fall in love in the Bible (or so Harold Kushner, America’s favorite rabbi, tells me). Prior to Jacob, men take wives and may, or may not, come to love them once the deal is done.

 

Jacob wants to marry Rachel but, because he has left town quickly and because his wealth is future-wealth rather than reach-in-your-pocket-and-flash-a-big-bankroll-wealth, he has no money to pay for Rachel. For you see, in agricultural societies, the loss of a daughter represented the loss of a field hand. So the would-be suitor needed to put up some kind of compensation for thinning the family work force. Which Jacob did by saying to Laban (his uncle….Rachel’s daddy): “Look, in exchange for sweet Rachel, I’ll work for you seven years. Work hard. Work long. Work cheap. Like, for nothing.”

 

Seven years come. Seven years go. And concerning those seven years, the Bible says: “They seemed to Jacob as but a few days because of the love he had for her.” All you single guys out there, write that down on your bulletin. If a variation on that line doesn’t wow her, she’s got a block of ice where her heart should be.

 

So there is a ceremony. Everybody sings. Everybody dances. Everybody drinks. Everybody drinks too much. And old Uncle Laban….wily old Uncle Laban….pulls a fast one on the fast one, slipping Rachel’s older sister, Leah, into the marriage bed in the place where Rachel ought to be. Leading Jacob to learn what many have subsequently discovered. That as clever as you are, sooner or later you’re going to run up against somebody slicker than you are.

 

So, back to the drawing board. How many more years for Rachel? Seven more years for Rachel. Which Jacob pays. I told you this is a love story. Finally, fourteen years after their first kiss, Jacob and Rachel are properly husband and wife, just as Jacob and Leah are husband and wife (although Leah, if you read Genesis carefully, is primarily a baby-maker, while Rachel is clearly the beloved).

 

Still, nobody leaves Syria for six more years. During that period, Jacob prospers….both in terms of children and animals. Then, in year twenty, Jacob (with a little nocturnal nudging from God) says to wives, kids, manservants, maidservants and sheep (insofar as one can talk to sheep): “It’s time to get out of here. Let’s go home.”

 

The story, which is actually a paste-together job of two different writers, then gets a tad fuzzy as to whether Jacob’s getaway is going to be easy or hard. Assuming it is going to be hard, Jacob rounds everybody up and leaves the ranch while Laban’s back is turned, giving himself (and his not-unsizable entourage) a three-day head start on his uncle.

 

But with all those babies.…not to mention all those sheep….Jacob can’t move very fast. So seven days later, Uncle Laban and his band of merry men catch up with the departees, whereupon everybody huffs a lot, puffs a lot, bluffs a lot, but nobody hurts anybody….or even threatens to hurt anybody….until Laban says: “You stole my gods. It’s bad enough that you took my daughters, my grandbabies and my sheep. But why did you have to grab my gods, too?”

 

What are we talking about here? We are talking about “teraphim” here….household idols…. small cultic worship objects….maybe with a carved face, maybe not….maybe figurines, maybe not. Nobody’s quite sure what they were. Or who took them. And in the dominant version of the story, Jacob doesn’t know who took them. In fact, so sure is Jacob that nobody in his party took Laban’s gods, that he tells his uncle: “Go ahead and look. You find ‘em….whoever has ‘em….I’ll kill ‘em.” Well, you know who has ‘em, don’t you? Of course you know who has ‘em. Rachel has ‘em. She swept them up on the way out of town and has been hiding them ever since. But Laban, at Jacob’s urging, goes hunting. He turns Jacob’s tent upside down. No gods. He turns Leah’s tent inside out. No gods. He searches both maidservants’ tents….and, for all I know, every other tent on the grounds. No gods.

 

Finally, he reaches Rachel’s tent. Where Rachel is sitting. On the gods. And she says: “Pardon me, father, if I do not rise up and show you proper respect, because (at the moment) it is with me as it sometimes is with women.” Meaning that Rachel is in the red tent (to borrow an image from a well-written and popular novel). For to “be in the way of women” is to be religiously and ritualistically “unclean.” To which Laban can only say: “Oh….(or) Sorry….(or) Next time I’ll knock.” In point of fact, whatever Laban said is lost to history, since neither storyteller bothered to record it.

 

The question, of course, is why? Not why didn’t they record it. But why did Rachel steal the gods?

            To add to the booty?

                        Possibly, but not likely.

            To show up her daddy?

                        Possibly, but not likely.

            To present to her hubby?

                        Possibly, but highly unlikely.

The gods Rachel stole were not representations of her husband’s God. Presumably, over the twenty years of conversation following that first kiss, Jacob’s God had become Rachel’s God. Presumably, they had come to some kind of agreement that theirs was the one God….the creator of the heavens and the earth….the God of the covenant with Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and soon-to-be Joseph (her child, Joseph)….the one God of Moses and the Law, David and the monarchy, Isaiah and the prophets….the God of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ….and through him, the God of our faith, apostolic and universal, which even we (at least one Sunday in six) rise and fervently proclaim. So what is this business about Rachel’s sweeping “holy stuff” off her daddy’s mantel and stuffing it under her skirt?

 

Well, I think I have figured it out. What’s more, I’ve even found a trio of scholarly commentators who agree with me. Rachel grabs the gods because she wants a little backup in case the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob (and all those other guys) can’t cut it and falls short on delivery. Concerning Jacob’s God, Rachel saluted, but isn’t certain….signed on, but isn’t sure….traveled seven days down the road, but is covering her bets….just in case. And, in that regard, I submit that she is not all that different from a lot of us. Her sin (if schlepping the gods under her skirt can be termed a sin as opposed to a “weakness of the spirit”) is not thievery, nor is it idolatry, so much as what I called in last Sunday’s unison prayer: “Our on again, off again, trust in God.” “Sure I believe,” she said. “But in a world where slam dunks are hard to come by, doesn’t everybody hedge their bets?” She steals the gods from her father because she never knows when she may need them. And she hides her theft from her husband because what spouse wants to tell the last of the true believers (or, in her case, one of the first of the true believers) that, spiritually speaking, she’ll go where he goes, but she’s not where he is.

 

I abhor telling old preacher-stories that have already found their way into 74,000 sermons. For you’ve heard at least one variation about the man who tumbles off a cliff, finds himself in free fall, grabs a branch, hangs on for dear life, looks in the general direction of the heavens, and then lifts a prayer: “Hey, I say, is there anybody up there?” To which God answers: “Hey Joe….I know….I’ll show….let go….my arms will hold you.”

 

Still clinging to the branch, Joe prays once more: “Again, I say, is there anybody up there?” Second time, same answer: “Hey Joe….I know.…I’ll show….let go….my arms will hold you.” Third time, same prayer, same answer. Fourth time, new prayer: “Hey, I say, is there anybody else up there?”

 

The last time Billy Graham was in town, I chartered a bus, posted a sign-up sheet and took a bunch of my parishioners to the Silverdome. We sang. Billy preached. Then we settled ourselves in for the altar call. During the third verse of “Just As I Am,” one of our most committed leaders rose from his seat and went down front. We waited on him, just like Billy said we would. A half hour later, our paths crossed on the way to the bus. I half expected he would say: “You know, Bill, I’ve always been a Christian and I’ve always loved the church. But something happened tonight that touched a nerve in me and that opened a door for me….one that I just needed to walk through.” In point of fact, I had figured out half a dozen things he might possibly say to me. But what I was not prepared to hear was the explanation he finally offered, when he said: “I just figured, hey, it can’t hurt.”

 

Twenty-five years later, I’m still thinking about his answer. It’s clear that he wasn’t talking about a just-in-time commitment so much as a just-in-case commitment (just in case the commitments I have made before weren’t enough….just in case the beliefs I’ve expressed before weren’t enough….just in case the faith I’ve proclaimed before wasn’t enough). Nothing wrong with it. Nothing wrong at all. But pushing the logic, maybe he should join three or four additional churches, then get baptized in every one. He sounded like my father who never had any feeling for things “Catholic,” yet never drove a car (I mean never drove a car) without a St. Christopher medal pinned to the headliner….just in case, don’t you see….just in case.

 

No big deal, really. No big deal at all. If it makes you feel better….more confident….more secure (ah, that’s it, more secure)….why not? In fact, why make a fuss about Rachel’s keeping a skirtful of gods? Only this….“this” being my suspicion (just a suspicion, mind you) that loyalty divided is loyalty diluted. Spiritually speaking, sooner or later you’ve got to put all your eggs in one basket. There is nobody else up there.

 

In the sixties there was what the Roman Catholic Church called the Second Vatican Council. And the changes introduced were so radical that they upset a great many of the faithful….including, to the surprise of absolutely no one, a great many of the priests. In an effort to soften the impact, sessions were scheduled for Catholic clergy, and Jesuits (who have always had a holy calling for teaching) were conscripted to explain the changes. One enlisted to this task was Father Gene Monahan. On the day in question, Father Monahan stood (center stage) before a throng of his colleagues….barefooted….wearing just a pair of whitewashed trousers and T-shirt (an undershirt, really)….and looking into the eyes of an auditorium filled with bewildered priests, this is what he said:

 

           " I am 54 years old. I have spent most of my adult life with my back turned to the congregation as I ministered to the altar. Now, the church says: “Turn around and face the people.”

 

           " I have spent most of my life hiding among the incense pots and candles doing my work as a cleric. And now the church says: “Come out and be with the people.”

 

           " I have spent most of my adult life saying the mass in Latin. And now the church says: “Speak English. It is the language of the people.”

 

On and on he went, describing the changes (personally and painfully)….until he reached the end of his litany and concluded: “As you can see, I have been stripped of almost everything. All that I have left is God.”

 

My friends, I would submit to you that where he stopped his speech is the best of all possible places to start our year.

 

Print Friendly and PDF

Bigger Than a Breadbox 4/28/2002

First United Methodist Church, Birmingham, Michigan

Scripture: Job 38-42 (selected segments)

Recent letter writers to the New York Times are bemoaning the loss of the golden age of radio. If that be true, I don’t have the foggiest notion when that age was, let alone where it went. But I do remember a day before television when we sat in the living room and watched radio. If you don’t believe such a thing is possible, ask somebody who was there.

 

Among the shows I remember “watching” on the Philco was a game show entitled Twenty Questions, which featured a panel whose task it was to guess the name or nature of something by asking questions, no more than twenty. The only panelist’s name I recall is that of Lyle VanDeventer. I am certain, however, that by 12:05 this afternoon, I will have the entire panel, the emcee and the corporate sponsor, so gifted are you at coming up with such things.

 

There are only three “specifics” I remember about the show. First, the panel was very good. Second, the panelists were given one clue, namely that whatever was to be guessed could be classified as being animal, vegetable or mineral. Third, somewhere in the twenty questions a panelist was bound to ask: “Is it bigger than a breadbox?”

 

The very question dates me. It’s been a long time since I’ve seen a kitchen with a breadbox. In fact, let’s have a show of hands if you still have a breadbox in your kitchen. Yesterday afternoon, in an antique shop in Tequesta, Florida, Kris found an old breadbox and suggested I carry it home as a prop. The price tag said $28, which wasn’t daunting. But then I realized I’d have to haul it on the plane. So, thanks to Duane Young of the 8:15 crowd, I now have this breadbox in the pulpit as a visual reminder.

 

The “breadbox question” was the panel’s way of getting at the issue of size. So much so, that the phrase “bigger than a breadbox” came to represent something that was rather large. A “yes” answer to the breadbox question kept the panel (and the rest of us ) from thinking in terms too small. But it is time to leave radio trivia behind and confess a theological bias. I am finding that I am at a stage in my life where it is becoming increasingly important to view God as being “bigger than a breadbox.” Or, to put it another way, I am growing increasingly irritated with movements that strip God of grandeur and holiness, the better that God might be perceived in terms more accessible and intimate.

 

We are witnessing the domestication of God in our time. Which is not without appeal. For it is nice to have a God who is comfortably relational. And relationships come easier when the one being related to is of a similar size. Several years ago, Modern Screen Magazine ran a series entitled “How the Stars Found Faith.” It was there that the late JaneRussell announced: “I love God. And when you get to know Him as I know Him, you’ll find He’s a living doll.” Which doesn’t do much for me. But I’m sure it meant something to Jane.

 

While the intimacy of Jane’s relationship with the Almighty seems a bit too intimate and familiar, I vividly recall a hymn of similar closeness:

 

            My God and I walk through the fields together.

            We walk and talk and jest as good friends do.

            We clasp our hands, our voices fill with laughter.

            My God and I walk through the meadows hue.

 

Other verses continue the image:

 

            He tells me of the years that went before me,

            When heavenly plans were made for me to be….

 

And then, jumping from pre-birth to post-death:

 

            This earth will pass, and with it common trifles,

            But God and I will go unendingly.

 

As a boy, I sang that hymn as a solo. It spoke powerfully once. And there are moments when it speaks powerfully still. I like the idea that mine is a “companioned journey.” There is comfort in the notion that God might take my hand in his. But a “companionable God” does not speak to all of me. For that God is a bit too small….and a bit too near. In that sentiment, I may well be alone. But hear me out.

 

When I used to teach Stephen Ministers how to be Stephen Ministers, one of my teaching specialties was prayer. It was my task to teach people how to pray out loud….in the company of others. Which is hard for the average person to do, given that prayer is perceived as being both personal and private. But there are techniques associated with doing it publicly. The first is to find a comfortable form of prayerful address. How are you going to address God aloud? What noun are you going to use? And what adjectives are you going to use to modify the noun?  In those years, I gave Stephen Ministers lists of nouns and adjectives, encouraging them to circle the ones that felt most natural. Some circled adjectives like “loving” and nouns like “Lord.” Others circled adjectives like “gentle” and nouns like “Friend.” A goodly number, both male and female, expressed an affinity with the noun “Father.” As do I. Yet I modify “Father” with adjectives like “almighty” and “heavenly.” I find myself less able to pray when the terms of address are too intimate, or when they suggest that prayer is simply a quiet little chat with someone as near as my elbow. Meaning that, as a form of approach, “gentle Friend” doesn’t do it for me.

 

I am in good historical company. The Jews of ancient Israel were terribly concerned lest God became overly familiar. Their concern permeated their laws. Don’t build statues of God. Don’t make images of God. Don’t even refer to God by name. That concern also permeated their stories. Consider Moses. God met him in a burning bush. But Moses was immediately told to take off his shoes, lest there be any assumption (on anybody’s part) that Moses, in full dress, had any right to be standing there.

 

But out of that encounter, God forged a relationship with Moses that was haunting and compelling. There was little doubt in Moses’ mind that he must do what God asked, which was to rescue God’s people. God had heard their groanings all the way from Egypt. Therefore, Moses was being sent to command the liberating effort, as well as be God’s chief negotiator in the court of Pharaoh. But in order to answer Pharaoh when the Egyptian ruler asked, “Says who?” (as surely he would), Moses said to God: “You had better give me your name.” But God simply answered: “Just tell them I Am who I Am. Tell Pharaoh that the great I Am sent you.” All of which was God’s way of saying: “There is more to me than any name can encompass.”

 

On another occasion, when Moses got overly close to God’s presence, he was told to turn around, face the mountain and hide himself in the cleft of the rock until God passed by, given that “no man can see the face of God and live.”

 

Sure, these stories are ancient. But they aren’t there by accident. These stories exist because our ancestors in the faith knew there was a danger in allowing a too-cozy relationship with deity to develop. For everything we humans get our hands on, we want to massage, manipulate, manage and muscle into submission. So why would it be any different if we humans were to get our hands on God?

 

We have seen the wisdom of such counsel. It explains why we begin worship with expressions of God’s grandeur. Didn’t we open our service this morning by singing:

                       

            O Lord my God, when I in awesome wonder

            Consider all the worlds thy hands have made.

            I see the stars, I hear the rolling thunder,

            Thy power throughout the universe displayed.

            Then sings my soul….WOW

 

            ….which was omitted from the text of the hymn, given that the lyricist decided to substitute the words “how great thou art.” But you get the idea.

 

There are, you see, good worshipful reasons for beginning thus. But I am not content to leave it there. I find myself needing to sing “How Great Thou Art” for a pair of personal reasons which, only now, are becoming clear to me. Kindly hear me out.

 

First, I need to sing of God’s grandeur as a way of clarifying whether my primary desire is that God serve me or lead me. I am 61 years old. This makes me at least middle aged. While far from the scrap heap of once-useful clergy, it has been a long time since anybody referred to me as “that bright young Turk of the church.” I have pretty much assessed my strengths, accommodated my weaknesses, and gotten comfortable with who I am. While I am sufficiently restless so as to never be completely settled, I do understand how easy it is for routines to become ruts, and for ruts to become caskets (albeit without ends or tops), and how tempting it is to cozy up to a God who will take care of me, companion me, fulfill me, forgive me, and allow my needs to set the agenda for our conversation, the better that I remain comfortable and secure.

 

But that is not the way I got here. I did not get here simply because God said “yes” to me, but because I also said “yes” to God. I did not get here simply by saying “Come into my life,” but rather “Take my life.” And I did not get here simply by making God welcome, but by submitting myself to obedience. For more than 60 years it has most often been “well with my soul” when I have been stretched in my skin. Comfortable as my surroundings are (and they are quite comfortable, thank you), this is still a barren land. And competent as I appear, I am very much a pilgrim. And so last Sunday’s hymn remains this Sunday’s prayer: “Guide me, O thou great Jehovah, pilgrim in this barren land.”

 

A pair of lay people were talking about their newly-appointed preacher. Said one: “There is no question he will love us as we have never been loved.” To which the other responded: “But when the time comes, will he be able to lead us where we have never been led?” At this stage of my life, I need God the Leader every bit as much as I need God the Lover. At 60 years of age, I am reasonably certain that I am loved. Truth be told, I haven’t spent ten minutes in the last ten years wondering whether God loved me. What is less certain is that I know, with clarity, where God would have me go.

 

Second, I sing a hymn of grandeur because I need to turn large chunks of my world over to a God I can trust with confidence. At 61 years old, I am at the top of my game. I am healthy. I am competent. I do not lack for education or experience. I know how to get people moved. I know how to get things done. I know how to affect change. But every day I realize that what I bring to the world’s need….what I bring to the church’s need…..what I bring to your need….is literally a drop in the bucket of what is necessary. It is a strange feeling to have reached a point in my life when both my sense of confidence and my sense of inadequacy are higher than they have ever been.

 

In a great book title, Philip Watson paraphrased Martin Luther by reminding us to Let Go and Let God. And, on more days than not, I find myself saying: “What choice is there?” Still, I need to believe that God is equal to all that I dump in God’s lap.

 

John F. Kennedy once said the thing that surprised him the most about the presidency, once he got there, was how little power he had to actually do anything. I read Kennedy’s statement 30 years ago. But I am only coming to understand it now. For, even at the height of my powers, I can’t do much of anything, either. To be sure, I can choose which side will receive the weight of my oar. But this boat we call “history” seems increasingly beyond my capacity to steer….or beyond anybody else’s capacity, either. Most days, it seems as if we have settled for steerage by committee (which may explain why we keep going in circles). So handing more and more of it over to God seems like the only reasonable alternative.

 

Woody Allen once quipped that God wasn’t dead but was merely an underachiever. Which, to some, was irreverent….to others, funny. But it’s a fear that many hold. Is God up to the challenge? Therefore, it is imperative that (in my search for God) I end up where Job does, face to face with a God who is bigger than I am….knows more than I know….and whose immensity and intellect I can somehow trust. In fact, it is probably more important (at this stage of my life) that I trust God, than that I love him.

 

A few years ago, I found myself in the copilot’s seat of a twin engine prop plane piloted by a man named Ralph. Ralph was flying six of us from the Livingston County Airport to the St. Clair Inn for dinner. It was one of those charity auction deals where Kris and I got to tag along with the winners. And, for reasons not entirely clear to me, Ralph suggested I sit up front.

 

Copilot is the best seat in the house. Or it was, until I realized I didn’t know the first thing about flying or landing that plane. I mean, what if Ralph suddenly grabbed his chest and pitched forward? What would we do? So I watched everything Ralph did….just in case. I asked some very pointed aeronautical questions….just in case. I even tried on Ralph’s headset so that I could sense a connection with the voices on the ground….just in case. But there was no way I could learn enough, fast enough. That plane had only one pilot. And it wasn’t me.

 

As it turned out, there was no cause for worry. Ralph was an experienced pilot with a good record. And a good heart. I even noted that when the waitress at the St. Clair Inn took the beverage order, Ralph said: “Make mine tomato juice.” I smiled, knowing that I was in the hands of a prudent and responsible man. I was also in the hands of a friend.

 

But whether Ralph was a friend or a stranger was largely irrelevant to my flying experience. Sitting in the copilot’s seat, I found it did not matter whether Ralph loved me, liked me, or merely tolerated my presence as one who came with the deal. What mattered was Ralph’s ability to fly the plane.

 

Another Ralph (an embalmer by trade) once gave me one of the nicest compliments I ever received. I had just finished speaking to his Lion’s Club which, in those days, met in the basement of a bar. As we were walking back to the car, Ralph said: “You know, I love to watch a craftsman at work. I don’t care whether it’s a meat cutter, a bricklayer, another embalmer, or someone who does what you just did. I can’t get enough of it.”

 

Which brings us back to Job. Filled with doubts….filled with complaints….filled with uncertainties….his head swimming with questions about God and God’s ways….his hands bloody and raw from beating on the gates of heaven, refusing to leave without an audience with holiness….what does Job get?

 

                        Answers? No.

                        Assurances? No.

                        Affection? Not really.

 

What Job gets, for all of his trouble, is the privilege of glimpsing a Craftsman at work. Somehow, I find myself wanting to believe that as Job listened and watched (longer than anybody has before or since), he finally tiptoed away, closing the gate quietly behind him….satisfied that even if he (Job) was still in the dark, at least God knew what God was doing.

 

 

 

 

Note: Prior to the sermon, I confessed to an imbalance in my usage of the Bible for preaching, given that the last time I built a sermon around an Old Testament text was in the month of January. I then talked about the Book of Job….what it was and what it wasn’t. I suggested that the first 37 chapters alternated between Job’s lament and Job’s complaint, relative to the disproportional amount of suffering that had befallen him. But I suggested that chapters 38-42….when Job is finally granted an audience with the Almighty…. did not so much record God’s answers as God’s questions. I then said it was not too far out of line to suggest that the sum of God’s interrogation could be gathered under the heading: “So What Do You Know About Running a Universe?” Following which I read selectively from God’s questions to Job and, more pointedly, from Job’s humble responses to God….where, in effect, Job confessed that he really didn’t know much about running a uni

Print Friendly and PDF

Before Winter 9/8/2002

First United Methodist Church, Birmingham, Michigan

Scripture: II Timothy 4:9-5, 19-21

As most of you know, we now have all of the formal approvals we need from the City of Birmingham to build our Christian Life Center, and it is our intention to break ground as part of our anniversary celebration on Sunday, September 29 at 12:30. Many of you even attended one or more city meetings which stretched over eleven months from beginning to end.

 

Strangely enough, it was the most mundane of those meetings that produced a moment of high drama. The date was Monday, August 12. The setting was the City Commission. Little appeared to be at stake, which is why we made no effort to drum up a crowd. A few of us appeared before the Commission, not to present anything, but to formally request a place on the next meeting’s agenda….the meeting scheduled for Monday, August 26. It all sounded routine, especially with our ducks in a row and eleven months of practice behind us.

 

Little did we know that the Commission was staring at a mountain of unfinished business and was seeking to delay anything and everything it could. Hence, they proposed that we have our final review, not on August 26, but one month later on September 23. After all, “this month, next month, what’s the difference?” Quickly, we had to explain the difference. One month’s delay would slow the permit process….itself, a six-week effort. No permits, no site work. No site work, no bulldozers and back hoes. No bulldozers and back hoes (before the ground freezes), no footings and no asphalt. Meaning nothing to park on….or build on….till spring. All of sudden the critical question became: “Does anybody know when the asphalt plants close for the winter?”  When the commissioners heard “the first week in November,” you could sense the tide turning in our favor. Which is how we got on the August agenda, just as we hoped.

 

All of which brought back memories of an era when the coming of winter forced people to act with greater urgency than is required today. At the house in which I was raised, we had to get the screens down and the storms up….before winter. Out in the garden, we had to get the daffodils into the ground and the dahlias out of the ground….before winter. And when it came to the car, there were things like antifreeze, studs and tire chains to consider….before winter. Even today, one hears commercialized warnings directed at those who would fail to winterize. And there’s always the necessity of a flu shot. Again, before winter.

 

With that in mind, I would launch our program year by holding up a little phrase from Paul’s second letter to Timothy which breathes the same urgency. As the letter unfolds, Paul is in a Roman jail….dying. At this point in his life he is down to three close and abiding friends….the Master whom he serves….the doctor (Luke) who serves him….and a young half-caste apprentice, Timothy, who Paul has left in charge of the church at Ephesus. So he writes Timothy from jail, asking him to come to Rome and bring his books and his old travel-stained robe. To these requests, he adds a postscript: “Do your best to come quickly. Come before winter.”

 

Why before winter? A pair of reasons suggest themselves. One has to do with mobility. The other with mortality. Mobility means that winter may render the Mediterranean unnavigable, with bitter gales closing the shipping lanes till spring. Mortality means that Paul doesn’t figure to be around come spring.

 

Before winter or never. It sounds harsh, doesn’t it? But the truth is, there are things that will never get done if they are not completed before winter. There are certain doors, open now, that the winds of winter will surely slam shut. And there are certain voices, available now, which winter may silence forever. Most obvious, of course, is the voice of some significant other. Not everybody we know and love is going to weather another winter. Had Timothy dallied till spring, he would have arrived in Rome to find Paul silent in the ground.

 

This awareness of winter’s inevitability injects a certain urgency into every human relationship. It has long been rumored that mothers tell their daughters they should never go out of the house without clean underwear, lest they become involved in an accident and wind up in an emergency room. For similar reasons, Kris and I never go away for more than a day without making sure the house is clean and the dishes are out of the sink, lest there should come a day when we don’t return to the house and someone else has to come in and sift the stuff of our lives. The tragedy is that all kinds of people who die with clean underwear and no dishes in the sink, also die with words on their lips they wish they could have spoken, or words in their ears they wish they could have heard.

 

Fred was flying on one of those small jets from somewhere to San Diego. You know the ones I mean, the jets that have three seats on one side of the aisle and two on the other. He was one of the two….on the aisle. She was the other one of the two….next to the window. She was a stranger….traveling alone….forty-ish….and crying. Fred, being a minister, figured it was his professional duty to respond to the crying. Which he did by saying: “It would seem that this is not a very happy trip for you.”

 

“No,” she said, “it isn’t. I’m going to my father’s funeral.”

 

“I’m sorry,” said Fred. “I can tell by your tears that you and your father were very close.”

 

“No, on the contrary, I haven’t spoken to my father….written to my father….called my father…. seen my father….in seventeen years. Seventeen years.”

 

“Really?”

 

“In fact,” she said, “the last time I saw him, I was in his home. We got into a quarrel. I got up from the table, threw my napkin on my plate, and as I slammed the door leaving his house, I said: ‘You can go to hell.’ That’s the last thing I said to my father. And now he’s dead.”

One of life’s lousier moments is when we realize that we never got around to saying what somebody has now slipped beyond the range of hearing. Because of winter.

 

Not everything in our personal lives can be put on hold. Some things, yes. Other things, no. It’s true for relationships. It’s also true for opportunities. I don’t know if opportunity knocks but once. They say that. But do they really know that? And who are “they,” anyway? Still, folk wisdom is often grounded in reality. And next week (unless I miss my bet), at least twenty of you are going to tell me about a door that was there to be walked through, had you taken advantage of the limited time it was open. Where time was concerned, you thought you had plenty. And where the door was concerned, you thought it was permanently wedged. But you didn’t. And it wasn’t. Instead, the door came spring-loaded. And when it slammed in your face, it felt like….well, you know what it felt like….it felt like winter. Brrr.

 

This is true in public life, every bit as much as in private life. People who practice statecraft know that there is often a moment in the affairs of nations….an open window in the escalation of conflict….which, if seized in time, can arrest a slide into disaster. Isn’t the real sadness of the Middle East the number of such moments that have been missed, leading historians to say: “The window was there. Maybe only for a few days. Maybe only for a few hours. But nobody took advantage of it before winter blew it shut.”

 

Labor negotiators know the same thing. Settlements signal themselves with whispers, long before they speak themselves with offers. But if nobody is attentive to the whispers, there are no offers. I saw baseball at Wrigley Field on Monday, as I was pretty sure I would. Because, for the first time in memory, the participants seized the opportunity available to them and behaved sensibly, proclaiming that “the need to get it done” took precedence over the need to get it all.

 

But the most important voice of seasonal urgency is not the voice of a significant other, nor the voice of public or private opportunity. It is the voice of the Lord Jesus Christ. As you know, I am as willing to explore the social and psychological aspects of the Christian faith as any preacher. But I have never lost my sense of the centrality of Christian conversion. The church which fails to preach conversion has no gospel. And the church which fails to harvest converts is as disobedient as it is dumb.

 

But the Christian faith did not begin around an oval table in a first century seminar room, with a bunch of people pondering “Messianic musings in the Middle East” (“Well, Eli, tell us what people up your way are thinking about Jesus.”). No, the Christian faith began beside a lake when Jesus laid it on the line to a couple of guys about who he was and who they were….and then (at some point in the conversation) said: “So are you guys coming or fishing?”

 

Sooner or later, it comes down to just such a decision….about who is going to be the central loyalty of your life….whose name you are going to name….whose banner you are going to carry….whose kingdom you are going to seek….and in whose army you are going to march. When the surrounding culture is a quasi-Christian culture, maybe you can backburner such a decision and drift in the general direction of the prevailing ethos. But I’ve got news for you. The prevailing culture is no longer Christian. Which means that you no longer can….go with its flow, I mean. Drifters need to become deciders.

And even if you’ve already made that decision, I think you need to freshen it from time to time. In the space reserved for “denominational preference,” a lady once penciled in the words “Jehovah’s bystander.” When pressed for an explanation, she said: “I used to be a Witness, but I sorta became disinvolved.” So have a lot of us, lady. So have a lot of us.

 

Let me re-offer a confession. There are times I worry that I have done you a disservice as your preacher….especially in my preaching about grace. You know that I am “bullish” on grace. You know I think that God’s mercy and love are going to be there for you, whether you avail yourselves of them early or late. You know of my belief that anybody who will go to the cross for you will not let any barrier (including your cussedness, your hardness of heart, or even your death) get in the way of his desire to wait you out, track you down and bring you home.

 

Nor would I backtrack on any of that. But my fear is that you will hear me preach such things (especially when I do so with passion and eloquence) and will say: “No rush. No big deal. I’ve got all the time in the world. And if I push the envelope of Ritter’s sermons to the outer limit, maybe I’ve got all the time in the next world, too.”

 

I suppose you can test that out. But I hope you don’t. Not because of the eternal consequences, but because of the immediate ones. A sweet young girl (filled to the brim with Jesus) dials my telephone and asks: “If you die tonight, do you know where you will spend eternity?” And a part of me wants to answer: “Sweetheart, I am prepared to leave eternity in God’s hands, but if you’ve got anything that will help me figure out tomorrow, I’m willing to listen. I need all the help I can get right now.”

 

Let me put it as bluntly as I can. This is my tenth year as your pastor, I think I know you pretty well. And one of the things I know about you is that you are as bullish on grace as I am….. meaning that there are probably not more than ten of you who have spent ten minutes in the last ten years worrying about your fitness for eternity. You ask me all kinds of questions. In fact, you’d be amazed at the range of questions that you put before me. But I can’t recall more than one or two of you ever inquiring about your prospects for eternity. As a congregation, you’re a pretty confident lot. So I am not likely to motivate you to make a present commitment in order to secure a future reward. Which, given my theology, I am not inclined to do anyway. But what I have said….loud and clear….early and late….yesterday, today and (as God gives me voice) most likely tomorrow….is that the purpose of saying “Yes” to Jesus Christ today is for the sake of today.

 

Think about it this way. I didn’t marry my wife when I did, just so I’d have somebody to grow old with, retire with, or rock in the nursing home with. Kris wasn’t some kind of insurance policy against the day when my bladder failed and my friends baled. I married her because I believed that, whether I could live one day longer without her, I didn’t want to….and figured it was stupid to go on pretending otherwise.

 

So there I stood at 3:00 on July 2, 1966 in a sanctuary eerily reminiscent of this one. Right down front I stood….two preachers before me….three friends beside me….an organ swelling around me….goose bumps rising all over me….sweat dripping….heart racing….hands shaking….five thousand to the left of me….another five thousand to the right of me….all of them standing….she walking….toward me (of all people).  And I suddenly thought to myself: “Saints preserve us, this isn’t just ‘hanging around’ with Tina Larson anymore.”

 

I didn’t need to do that. At least, not right then. I probably could have strung things out for a year or two. Maybe even three.

 

Oh, but I did need to do that. I really did. And, by the grace of God, I was smart enough to know I did.

 

My friends, I’ve gotta believe there are a lot of you in this church who have been “hanging around with Jesus” for a long time….occasionally touching the fringe of his garment….listening to him speak from the relative safety of a sycamore tree….or a church balcony….or even right down front (maybe even in the choir), the better to fool your friends and fake out your preacher. I have got to believe this church is comfortably filled with the closet admirers of Jesus.

 

All of which would be all right, I guess, if Jesus wanted admirers. Except I doubt he does. I think he’d rather have some followers.

 

So what are you going to do about Jesus?

 

I think you need to decide sooner or later, today rather than tomorrow, now rather than sometime….not because you may die on your way home from church….but because you probably won’t.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note:  Before reading the text from II Timothy, I explained that there are some texts I have used, and there are other texts that have used me. This is a text that has used me, ever since I first heard Colin Morris preach it nearly thirty years ago. I’ve probably visited it three or four times since. Look for Morris’ treatment of it in the book Mankind, My Church. As for the preacher and the stranger flying to San Diego, credit Fred Craddock for that one.

Print Friendly and PDF